NSWCCL Committee Member Lydia Shelley speaks to ABC radio:
"Coming down here today was a very important personal choice to me, but it's also indicative of the overwhelming feelings coming from the Muslim community as well," Ms Shelly said.
"We wanted to pay our respects for the lives that have been lost and to pay our respects to those who were injured in the experience that they went through.
"I'm just incredibly sad ... every single other Australian today is feeling the exact same thing."
Ms Shelly said the focus today should be on the victims rather than a potential backlash against the Muslim community.
"Our overwhelming focus has been on those who have lost their lives and our thoughts and prayers and condolences go out to the family members," she said.
"I don't even feel like it's right to speak about any potential blowback on a day like this because obviously that's not our focus at all.
"I would hope that the overwhelming messages of support that we've received is indicative of Australians rising up, reaching out to each other, strengthening our bonds.
"We're not going to give into fear and mistrust of each other."
Ms Shelly has denied claims the man responsible for the attack, Man Haron Monis, was an Islamic cleric. She said he was a sick man who was not representative of Muslim Australia.
"This man was not an Islamic cleric at all," she said.
"He was a self styled sheik, that's the name that he gave himself. He was not known to preach in our mosques or anything like that.
"These are the actions of somebody who is incredibly sick and very disturbed. It is not a reflection on our sheiks, on our faith at all, on our community and I think the majority of Australians and the support that we've received understand that message."
Read the full story and listen: Muslim community leaders join mourners to pay respects to Sydney siege victims
Source: The World Today, ABC Radio 16/12/14
The NSW Police is trialling unmanned drone aircraft, which if successful could be used in search and rescue and emergencies.
The NSW Council for Civil Liberties president Stephen Blanks said he did not oppose police using drones for search and rescue operations.
But he said the public must be assured they would never be used for general surveillance activity.
"If there are benefits which can be had from the use of devices like this in emergency situations then there should be rules in place which allow these devices to be used," Mr Blanks said.
"But we also need rules that make it absolutely clear how long recordings are kept for, when they are destroyed and notification of people who may be concerned about being captured by these devices."
Article: NSW Police to trial unmanned drones
Source: Sydney Morning Herald, 6/12/2014
NSWCCL Committee member Nicholas Cowdery and Dr Alex Wodak discuss the failure of NSW drug surveillance programs
"Drug arrests and the rare fatalities at dance parties and music festivals are major media stories. Community concerns about drugs ensure that politicians and police leaders are keen to be seen to be doing something. Intensive police operations fit the bill. But do they actually reduce drug use or drug harms?
During surveillance operations only in a tiny minority of searches find any drugs. Interpreting signals from the dogs, police officers often think drugs are present when there are none. Very many people who have drugs at these events are not detected. These operations achieve little and too often they are counter-productive.
NSW passed laws in 2001 to allow police to use dogs for public surveillance with the intention of catching more drug traffickers. In 2006, the NSW Ombudsman reviewed the program and found that successful prosecutions for supply were achieved in just 19 of 10211 searches. Given the scale of the NSW drug market it is an abject failure.
The impact of these intrusive searches on people's lives is a major negative of the program. Another cost is that these operations seem to only increase the health risks. The presence of drug dogs at festivals and parties creates an incentive for attendees to take all their drugs at once prior to entering. Often this is preplanned, but sometimes it is a panicked decision when confronted by the dogs. In a study of drug safety at raves, 30 per cent of those interviewed reported that they consumed drugs to avoid detection after seeing dogs at an event. A young man overdosed and died after doing this at a music festival in Penrith in 2013. Many other harmful but nonfatal overdoses undoubtedly occur."
The full article can be found at the link below
Source: Sydney Morning Herald, 30/11/2014
In re-writing the law on foreign fighters, the Government is increasing the law and order emphasis on stopping the Australian based frontmen for Islamic State. The new and broader control order regime gives the Federal Police more scope to isolate people who are recruiting Sunni Muslims to travel abroad and fight.
"There's still a whole lot of mystery around about this intelligence sharing... I think the Australian public are entitled to know a whole lot more about how the intelligence gathering functions of government work, how they interact with law enforcement and with the defence force." - NSWCCL President, Stephen Blanks
Source: ABC Radio PM, 25/11/14
The NSW Council for Civil Liberties and Muslim Legal Network, which will front the inquiry on Thursday, are concerned at the speed the government wants to move the laws through parliament.
"The short time frame is an abuse of process and lays the foundation for reckless lawmaking," they told the committee.
Source: 9 News Australia, 13/11/2014
The window of opportunity to complain to the government about the latest changes to national security laws has closed with barely a ripple of protest.
NSWCCL's Stephen Blanks and Muslim Legal Network's Lydia Shelly speak to ABC Radio following a joint submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security .
Source: ABC Radio "PM", 12/11/2014
Proposed anti-terror law represents a "back door" to allow targeted killings of Australians on foreign battle fields
The Abbott government's latest proposed anti-terror law represents a "back door" to allow targeted killings of Australians on foreign battle fields, and make the Australian Muslim community feel "targeted" by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, the Muslim Legal Network and the NSW Council of Civil Liberties argue in their joint submission to a parliamentary committee reviewing the Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2014, introduced to Parliament on October 30 by Attorney-General George Brandis.
Source: Sydney Morning Herald, 12/11/2014
NSW government agencies are pushing ahead with the linking and sharing of personal data stored on massive databases to make life "convenient".
Coming soon are changes to the way Compulsory Third Party Green Slips will be purchased in 2015
The insurers are building a real-time computer interface with the registry. The industry says it wants to check for fraud, particularly where a driver claims their car is garaged, but is in fact parked on the street in a different suburb.
The president of the NSW Civil Liberties Council Stephen Blanks says opening the register to insurance companies shows the "dangers of creating databanks and function creep".
Source: Sydney Morning Herald. 2/11/2014
Insurance companies will be able to access personal data held on the motor vehicle registry before quoting a price to a potential customer for a Green Slip, under NSW government changes.
But the NSW Civil Liberties Council president Stephen Blanks said giving insurance companies access to a government registry through a regulation change "shows the dangers of creating databanks and function creep".
This occurs where a database of personal information is created for one purpose, but over time is used for more and more purposes.
"This can be done without any real public scrutiny at an agency level," Mr Blanks said.
Source: Sydney Morning Herald, 2/11/2014
Yesterday opponents of Australia’s mooted data retention laws held a protest meeting in Parliament House.
It was led by three cross-bench senators who oppose the legislation – The Greens’ Scott Ludlam, independent Nick Xenophon, and libertarian David Leyonhjelm. They were joined by a large cross section of communications industry and privacy advocates, including Communications Alliance and the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.
Others opposing the legislation include Electronic Frontiers Australia, Pirate Party Australia, Blueprint for Free Speech, Civil Liberties Australia, Internet Society of Australia, Institute of Public Affairs, Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association, the Law Council of Australia, Liberty Victoria, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, the Australian Privacy Foundation, iiNet, the NSW Council for Civil Liberties, and ThoughtWorks.