Log in
  • Current Work
    • Current Work
    • NSWCCL Action Groups
    • Asylum seekers and refugees
    • National security and counter-terrorism
    • Free speech, censorship, privacy and data retention
    • Criminal justice, police powers and mental health
    • Civil and human rights
    • Right to Protest
    • First Nations Justice
    • Internships
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • NSWCCL in the media
    • Letters
    • Newsletters
    • Speeches
    • Submissions (blog)
    • Submissions archive
    • Submissions by policy area
  • About
    • About
    • Early history
    • Governance
    • Constitution
    • 2020-21 Executive
    • 2020-21 Committee
    • Your Civil Liberties
  • Issues
    • Issues
    • Death Penalty
  • Events
    • Events
    • Events
    • Past Events

Pages tagged "bodily autonomy"


Supreme Court of Western Australia rules bottom pinching isn’t indecent assault

Posted on Civil and human rights by Michael Brull · April 17, 2019 12:49 PM

A controversial Local Court judgment in Western Australia in relation to indecent assault has been upheld by the Western Australia Supreme Court. The judgment turned on an agreed set of facts. After a charity wheelchair basketball event, members of the police team prepared to take a group photo. One of the men in the photo said something like “don’t take this the wrong way”, and as the photo was about to be taken, pinched a woman on the side of her right buttock. The woman accepted that this action was intended to be “in some way humorous" and was done "in order to provoke a startled reaction”.

It was agreed that there was an unlawful assault, however the prosecution needed to also show the assault was indecent. Indecent assault carries up to 5 years imprisonment, and a fine of $24,000. For an assault to be indecent, it must have a sexual connotation, and offend against prevailing contemporary community standards of decency and propriety. The Magistrate made a series of findings, concluding that touching a person’s bottom was not necessarily or inherently indecent and the pinch in this case was an example of unlawful but not indecent touching.

Read more

  • Join NSWCCL
  • Latest News
  • Become a supporter
  • Get involved
  • Donate
  • NSWCCL in the media
  • Events
  • Renew membership
  • Receive the 'Civil Source' newsletter and important civil liberties updates.

    Sign up
  • Like on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Your pages
  • Settings
Follow @nswccl on Twitter

Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Copyright 2019 © NSWCCL. All Rights Reserved.

Back to top