Submission on the Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013 - April 2013
"Both world-wide historically and in Australia in recent times there has been much discrimination and worse against LGBTI people.1 Unlike, say religious or political views, people cannot change such characteristics (and if they could, they should not be expected to). Though some protection is provided by State and Territory legislation, the provisions vary between these jurisdictions, and their coverage is restricted. The bill will contribute to an improvement in LGBTI persons' situation. We urge its speedy passage--as an important measure until a revised Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill is introduced."
NSWCCL recently appeared before the New South Wales Legislative Council Standing Committee on Law and Justice to give evidence relating to the inquiry into racial vilification law in NSW. A supplementary submission has been made in response to questions posed during the committee hearing, providing more detailed discussion than possible at the hearing.
Submission to Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on Federal Court Fee increases since 2010 - April 2013
"All persons must, as a matter of their civil rights, have the capacity to access the Federal Court regardless of their financial situation or other means. In addition, the fees associated with accessing the Federal Court must not act as a material detriment to their accessing the court if they judge that doing so is an appropriate course of action."
Submission on the Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 - April 2013
"the proposals in the bill have the potential to impact greatly on many Australians, young and old alike, who do not necessarily possess any criminal intent, without providing sufficient nexus to the more serious offences the bill aims to prevent."
Submission to the Legislative Council Standing Committee's inquiry into Racial vilification law in NSW - March 2013
NSWCCL believes that the sections under review have failed to legitimately criminalise serious racial vilification. Further, it is possible to reform the legislation to be more effective, whilst also maintaining the right to free speech.
"We have considered the clauses carefully. We cannot support the proposed legislation... CCL holds therefore that legislation which is to operate extra-jurisdictionally outside Australia should be confined to matters where the United Nations has mandated such extrajurisdictional operation in an international treaty."
The submission expresses concerns regarding the loose definition of 'disorderly' conduct, and the subsequent high degree of discretion granted to police in determining whether behaviour is disorderly.
Submission to the NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee no. 4 Inquiry into the use of cannabis for medical purposes - February 2013
"The NSW Council for Civil Liberties considers that drug use should be addressed as a health issue, not a legal issue... The use of cannabis for medical purposes should be decriminalised to allow its use if medically qualified people consider that it has health benefits... The Committee should recommend that a trial of medical cannabis be commenced as soon as practicable."
Submission to the inquiry into the Exposure Draft of the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill 2012 - December 2012
NSWCCL supports Australia’s continuing commitment to international human rights instruments, and regards the consolidation of legislation within this Bill as an attempt to meet such obligations. NSWCCL notes that the operation of the legislation will allow exceptions within areas such as social security, migration and marriage policy. Discrimination in these areas is as arbitrary as anywhere else. NSWCCL opposes these exceptions.
Submission in relation to the Inquiry into the Migration and Security Legislation Amendment (Review of Security Assessments) Bill 2012 - December 2012
The Migration and Security Legislation Amendment (Review of Security Assessments) Bill 2012 addresses numerous voids in the current system in operation with regard to refugees classed as representing an adverse security risk. Most importantly, it is submitted that the Bill should clearly provide that detention of citizens and non-citizens alike should not be permissible solely on the basis of being issued an adverse security assessment.